Board discussions are confidential, this is common practice for non-profits
so that board members can speak freely. I'm happy to answer any questions
you have about this decision.

The grant from FUTO last year was hardly
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eoV9amsnaQg> a secret, the video about it
had over 21,000 views.



On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 4:35 PM <free...@nullvoid.me> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As a non-contributor of code, but running nodes, and donating
> occasionally. How can I view the discussion that the board had? All I can
> find public tax documents that they received over $100,000 this year in
> donations. There is no board meeting minutes or mailing list (or paper
> trail)
>
> An anti-censorship project should be more transparent.
>
> Thanks,
>
> On January 17, 2023 10:06:51 PM UTC, "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <
> arne_...@web.de> wrote:
> >
> >Ian Clarke <i...@freenetproject.org> writes:
> >> You're speaking as if you speak on behalf of the Freenet community. Who
> specifically are you speaking for and what gives you the ability to speak
> for
> >> them?
> >
> >I share the sentiment. Steve spoke to me before sending this message,
> >and he also speaks for me, the release manager of Freenet. Also David,
> >Florent, and xor disagree strongly with the renaming plan. These are
> >most of the non-anonymous core developers of Freenet.
> >
> >And the actual Freenet community that communicates on Freenet via FMS
> >and Sone is absolutely enraged over this.
> >
> >Best wishes,
> >Arne
> >
> >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 2:46 PM Steve Dougherty <st...@asksteved.com>
> wrote:
> >>  I'm surprised. I'm not sure what to say, or what reaction you and the
> >>  rest of the board expected.
> >>
> >>  This is another demonstration of a complete disconnect between the
> board
> >>  of FPI, and the community around Freenet. After giving up initial plans
> >>  to name Locutus "Freenet 2" in the face of backlash, you and the rest
> of
> >>  the board appear to now want still more of Freenet's brand recognition.
> >>  The hope seems to be that the Freenet community, having not been
> >>  consulted, and reasonably assumed to disagree, will undertake the
> effort
> >>  to rename themselves the Freenet Classic community.
> >>
> >>  I don't think this will happen. It would require buy-in, and it has
> >>  none.
> >>
> >>  - Steve
> >
> >
>


-- 
Ian Clarke
Founder, The Freenet Project
Email: i...@freenetproject.org

Reply via email to