On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:29 AM, [Ricardo Rodriguez] Your EPEC Network ICT Team <webmas...@environmentalchange.net> wrote:
> Hi! > > Pascal Voitot wrote: > >> Hm, one thing I'd like to have before going forward with this app is a > >> better event management. The observation component is good, but we're > >> not using it enough. On top of it, we should build a workflow module. > >> Once we have this, writing a publishing control system should be easy. > >> At least a basic one, I don't know what those strange names you used > >> (HIPAA, HL7) imply. > >> > >> About integrating with another tool, this is also a good idea, provided > >> that the tool provides nice APIs, and the tool is complex enough to make > >> a velocity replacement hard to implement. > >> > >> > > > > Please guys, don't use heavy orchestration industrial engines. I use them > > all my days and there are really a pain, almost crazy. I can't understand > > why people continue to go in this way just to design automaton with few > > states and actions. > > Pleaaaaaaaaaase don't do that ;) > > Please, what are these "heavy orchestration industrial engines" you > propose to avoid? Thanks! > things like workflow engines such as jBPM, Bonita or even if we are crazier, BPEL (I don't see why we could use BPEL here but I really think this is the example of a technology that :) )... I don't say these engines are really bad but they are too much complicated, too much theoretic, too heavy for a simple workflow... > > Best, > > Ricardo > > -- > Ricardo RodrÃguez > Your EPEC Network ICT Team > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > devs@xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
