In the previous GRC you posted, there is a "Wave Select" Python block with
no inputs or outputs. I don't think we have enough info to figure out what
you are doing. As Paul Atreides mentioned, posting a full GRC would help.

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 10:36 PM Elmore Family <wa4...@comcast.net> wrote:

> Paul,
>
> Thanks for answering. The following is what I hope is a simplified
> presentation of my code that is pertinent to the issue. The top flowgraph
> is complex. The FT8_Receive hier block is simple. The connections section
> below should be sufficient for explaining it.
>
> I am using a gnu radio flowgraph to attempt to select the appropriate
> Selector Block output as explained below. The following error occurs when I
> run the flowgraph: Index Error: output_index must be < noutputs.
>
> Obviously the chosen index of 1 is less than the number of outputs 2. What
> is wrong?
>
> The following code is in an FT8_Receive hier block. It shows only the code
> pertinent to the issue I am experiencing. The connections section shows the
> Selector Block with 2 outputs connected to 2 Wave File Sinks. I am
> attempting to select the appropriate output by using wave_select in the
> output index as shown in def set_wave_select().
>
>  class FT8_Receive(gr.hier_block2):
>     def __init__(self, wave_select=0):
>         gr.hier_block2.__init__(
>             self, "FT8_Receive",
>                 gr.io_signature(1, 1, gr.sizeof_float*1),
>                 gr.io_signature(0, 0, 0),
>     )
>
>     ##################################################
>     # Parameters
>     ##################################################
>     self.wave_select = wave_select
>
>     ##################################################
>     # Connections
>     ##################################################
>     self.connect((self.blocks_selector_0, 1), (self.blocks_wavfile_sink_0_0, 
> 0))
>     self.connect((self.blocks_selector_0, 0), 
> (self.blocks_wavfile_sink_0_0_0, 0))
>     self.connect((self, 0), (self.rational_resampler_xxx_0, 0))
>     self.connect((self.rational_resampler_xxx_0, 0), (self.blocks_selector_0, 
> 0))
>
> .................................
>
>     def get_wave_select(self):
>         return self.wave_select
>
>     def set_wave_select(self, wave_select):
>         self.wave_select = wave_select
>         self.blocks_selector_0.set_output_index(self.wave_select)
>
> The following code is from the .py file that is an OOT in the top block of
> the flowgraph. This is where I am calling set_wave_select.
>
> from FT8_Receive import FT8_Receive
>
> RCV = FT8_Receive()
> wave_select = 1
> RCV.set_wave_select(wave_select)
>
>
> *From:* Paul Atreides
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 26, 2023 6:40 PM
> *To:* Elmore's
> *Cc:* discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> *Subject:* Re: Index Error: output_index < noutputs
>
> Jim, can you please re-post your flowgraph?
> I’ll try to take another look at it.
> Also, what version of GNURadio are you using?
>
> <end transmission>
>
> On Sep 26, 2023, at 11:48, Elmore's <wa4...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> 
> I have submitted this issue previously and received a response which
> resulted in my trying several things which didn’t work.
>
> I then submitted the issue to Stackoverflow and received no answers.
>
> I get this error when I try to use a Selector to select one of 2 outputs
> with my selection obviously being smaller than the number of outputs. I can
> successfully use a Selector if I use a number for the output index or a
> variable whose value is selected by a Toggle Button but not if I try to set
> the variable programmatically in Python.
>
> In general, why do you get such an error?  I am asking the question in
> this manner because my specific questions relating to my code and flowgraph
> have not resulted in any concrete answers (or any answers at all).
>
> Thanks again for any help. I have been struggling with this for several
> weeks.
>
> Jim
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
> Virus-free.www.avg.com
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>
>

Reply via email to