jean-christophe manciot wrote > 3) It is not always possible for the bug reporters to hand over their > original file(s), for many different reasons that are beyond the scope > of this thread (confidentiality, legal concerns and so on...).
I do not consider these reasons beyond the scope of this thread as most documents can be effectively redacted using a few simple measures. This is actually an important discussion. I understand that sometimes redaction is not an option and in these instances other options are required. jmadero wrote > It's up to a user to report with clear steps and a simple test document - > else it's just a > waste of our time. Joel, would it be worth having some step-by-step instructions on a wiki page somewhere to assist users with the process of redacting their documents? Usually a simple search / replace regular expression is enough for most documents. A list of some before / after examples may also be helpful. I have assisted users with this before on the alternate user forum. It is not going to help in every instance, but even if it inproved a small percentage it may be worth it. ----- Best wishes, Owen. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Intervention-tp4115492p4118597.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
