On Jan 22, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Robert Hoekman, Jr. wrote: > With all this in mind, I still don't understand why you're calling > me on this in this particular thread.
Because I'm a mind reader. Why else would you need a definition of one, except to draw a box around it so you can say the other is different? :) > I have yet to say anything about ACD being better than UCD. So, it's not? > I've only said we should work to define both. Yah, so I've heard. And how's that working for you? The problem with all these "definitions" is the old saying, "As soon as you draw a box around me, the first thing I want to do is step out of it." If this list has proven anything, it's that we CAN'T define "information", "interaction", "design", "usability", "personas", "designers", "design process", "design thinking", "typography", "layout", or any other term. Hell, we can't even define "definition." Maybe we need Justice Potter Stewart to moderate this list? Just sayin' Jared Jared M. Spool User Interface Engineering 510 Turnpike St., Suite 102, North Andover, MA 01845 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] p: +1 978 327 5561 http://uie.com Blog: http://uie.com/brainsparks ________________________________________________________________ *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah* February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/ ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
