On Mar 20, 2009, at 5:21 PM, Andrei Herasimchuk wrote:
On Mar 20, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Dan Saffer wrote:
Seems like reason enough for me.
So you think that testing 41 shades of blue or arguing about borders
being 2 to 4 pixels to the point of being asked to prove 2 is better
than 4 is a good thing? That all design decisions should be driven
by Google's insistence on data driven design by committee?
I read Dan's response as he thinks that *is* a good reason to leave.
(You had originally stated that they scared Doug away for "no good
reason".)
Of course, if I misinterpreted Dan's response, I apologize.
Jared
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... disc...@ixda.org
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
