On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:10, Tarek Ziadé <ziade.ta...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Lennart Regebro <rege...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:14, Tarek Ziadé <ziade.ta...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Ok so, in version 1.2 of your package, you use the implicit way (VCS based) >>> then you introduce a new file, that forces your to be explicit in 1.3 >> >> Why? >> > > because in 1.2 you don't want to add one file that is present in your VCS.
If you mean 1.3, you make sense. OK, so in 1.3 you want to have a file in the VCS, that should not be included in the distribution. Yes, that forces you to be explicit. This is true no matter if you use VCS to figure out the file list or not. In 1.2, you want all files. In 1.3 you want all but one. That will force you to be explicit. The method to determine the files makes zero difference. > I am just describing a scenario using your logic. No, you aren't, sorry. You obviously make some sort of implicit assumptions I'm not aware of, or you simply misunderstood me. -- Lennart Regebro: Pythonista, Barista, Notsotrista. http://regebro.wordpress.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig