On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 09:46 -0700, Martin Atkins wrote: > What is the back-compact impact of this on sites that do not use the flag? > > This is only an issue for systems that have existing, non-normalized > JIDs in their RosterStorage, right?
Correct -- well, any persistent storage of JIDs which your djabberd might have, but roster storage is the most likely. > If so, I'll commit this patch. I assume that most folks won't actually > need to use the back-compat flag since most folks will have normalized > JIDs stored. It's worth putting a caution in the changelog, since they're apparently more common than I originally thought, as well. Thanks! - Alex