was this ever actually applied? On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Alex Vandiver <ale...@bestpractical.com>wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 09:46 -0700, Martin Atkins wrote: > > What is the back-compact impact of this on sites that do not use the > flag? > > > > This is only an issue for systems that have existing, non-normalized > > JIDs in their RosterStorage, right? > > Correct -- well, any persistent storage of JIDs which your djabberd > might have, but roster storage is the most likely. > > > If so, I'll commit this patch. I assume that most folks won't actually > > need to use the back-compat flag since most folks will have normalized > > JIDs stored. > > It's worth putting a caution in the changelog, since they're apparently > more common than I originally thought, as well. > Thanks! > - Alex > >
