I've changed the canonicalization to relaxed and started working, dunno what would be the effect of this change.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Mark Martinec <mark.marti...@ijs.si> wrote: >>> Try mailing me some signed test message directly. > >> Subject: Re: test from mal...@gmail.com >> Authentication-Results: mail.ijs.si; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) >> header...@zonacitas.com; dkim-adsp=pass >> Authentication-Results: mail.ijs.si (amavisd-new); dkim=pass >> header...@zonacitas.com >> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; >> d=zonacitas.com; s=alpha; ... >> Thanks Mark !!! > > This one is fine too, with both dkim verifiers. > I wonder what is it that gmail does not like. > > Mark > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances > and start using them to simplify application deployment and > accelerate your shift to cloud computing. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > dkim-milter-discuss mailing list > dkim-milter-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list dkim-milter-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
