On Tuesday 28 September 2010 16:30:21 Pablo Garcia Melga wrote: > I've changed the canonicalization to relaxed and started working, > dunno what would be the effect of this change. > >> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; > >> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
Good to know. My choice would be the c=simple/relaxed . There is hardly any benefit from a 'relaxed' body canonicalization in my experience, but a 'relaxed' for a header can be useful. Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list dkim-milter-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss