On Tuesday 28 September 2010 16:30:21 Pablo Garcia Melga wrote:
> I've changed the canonicalization to relaxed and started working,
> dunno what would be the effect of this change.
> >> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple;
> >> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;

Good to know. My choice would be the c=simple/relaxed .
There is hardly any benefit from a 'relaxed' body canonicalization
in my experience, but a 'relaxed' for a header can be useful.

  Mark

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
dkim-milter-discuss mailing list
dkim-milter-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss

Reply via email to