On 28.04.2018 16:18, toki wrote:
On 04/27/2018 12:00 PM, Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote:
LibreOffice development does not follow the agile methodology.
Unless you really want a 25,000 word essay on the subject, I'll skip my
essay on Waterfall and relations, including derivatives v Agile and
relations, including derivatives, and how LibO development follows an
agile development process.
No, LibreOffice development is not attached to any management fad. Your
essay would merely document coincidentally overlapping characteristics
of agile and the actual things going on in LibO development.
concerns would in any case target LibreOffice *deployments* and not TDF
Before being deployed, organizations require the software to meet
certain requirements. In this specific instance, both Section 508, and
ADA. If those checkboxes aren't ticked, LibO won't be considered.
Expecting an organization to fork LibO, simply to ensure compliance with
local law, is way beyond the pale.
Talk of forking is not fitting as there is zero chance documentation
contributions of this genre would be refused. What is way beyond the
pale is considering LibO to be some dispenser of free beer eternally
running on unpaid labour.
Ilmari
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: documentation+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
