Yes, it should have been EEClass::InitializeFieldDescs Never mind my comment about encapsulation then :) I was thinking of something else
-----Original Message----- From: Discussion of the Rotor Shared Source CLI implementation [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arild Fines Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 3:10 PM To: DOTNET-ROTOR@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] Getting an mdTypeDef for the type of a field Discussion of the Rotor Shared Source CLI implementation wrote: > You might need to handle ELEMENT_TYPE_STRING, ELEMENT_TYPE_OBJECT, > ELEMENT_TYPE_SZARRAY, etc. Don't know what your intent is. No need for that at the moment, ELEMENT_TYPE_CLASS will suffice. What I'm doing only affects user-defined reference types. > > The best thing is to do whatever > MethodTableBuilder::InitializeFieldDescs does. Doxygen doesn't show a class named MethodTableBuilder, so I assume you are referring to EEClass::InitializeFieldDescs. > There are > encapsulations for checking if a signature element refers to a reference type, and > you should use that instead of checking directly for ELEMENT_TYPE_CLASS. All I see in there is a big switch that looks like this: case ELEMENT_TYPE_STRING: case ELEMENT_TYPE_SZARRAY: // single dim, zero case ELEMENT_TYPE_ARRAY: // all other arrays case ELEMENT_TYPE_CLASS: // objectrefs case ELEMENT_TYPE_OBJECT: case ELEMENT_TYPE_VAR: -- Arild AnkhSVN: http://ankhsvn.tigris.org Blog: http://ankhsvn.com/blog IRC: irc://irc.freenode.net/ankhsvn "The problem in the world today is communication. Too much communication." -- Homer Simpson =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentorŪ http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
