On Út 7.říj, Nico Sabbi wrote: > Il giorno lun, 06/10/2008 alle 22.09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: > > Hi, > > here are my answers. Cosmetics are not problem, but before fixing them, the > > idea > > of this code must be approved. For file there are 2 possible tag values - > > 261 > > for File Entry (4/14.9 in Ecma 167) or Extended File Entry (4/14.17). For > > some > > VOBS on DVD there is no File Entry or Extended File Entry. But there is > > Extended Attribute Header Entry with tag 262 (4/14.10). If I handle 262 > > entry > > as 261, than DVD plays fine, but that is wrong - EA Header is not File > > Entry + > > some data. It contains data associated with some File Entry, but there is > > none. > > Therefor this DVD is broken. But ISO 9660 filesystem is ok - kernel mounts > > this > > DVD and totem can play it (totem don't plays discs directly, but only > > mounted). > > I can play VOB directly using mplayer, but I can't use dvdnav or some > > mplayer front-ends. > > This ISO stuff uses correct ISO fs if file search on UDF fails. This fixes > > my > > problem - and maybe others, too. > > > > I agree completely with your method: accepting tag 262 as valid is plain > wrong, and for the rest (without reading the code of iso9660) the code > is fine > Please, don't top post in mplayerhq mailing lists
The ISO part is programmed using this documentation: http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~pje/iso9660.html I suppose, that simplified ISO spec is sufficient for DVD video. Moreover this is only fallback method. Is there any coding style for dvdnav/dvdread sources? May be GNU indent will fix this :). Or did you mean something different as cosmetics? -- Jezz mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ DVDnav-discuss mailing list DVDnav-discuss@mplayerhq.hu https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/dvdnav-discuss
