On St 8.říj, Nico Sabbi wrote: > Il giorno mer, 08/10/2008 alle 21.10 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: > > On Út 7.říj, Nico Sabbi wrote: > > > Il giorno lun, 06/10/2008 alle 22.09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: > > > > Hi, > > > > here are my answers. Cosmetics are not problem, but before fixing them, > > > > the idea > > > > of this code must be approved. For file there are 2 possible tag values > > > > - 261 > > > > for File Entry (4/14.9 in Ecma 167) or Extended File Entry (4/14.17). > > > > For some > > > > VOBS on DVD there is no File Entry or Extended File Entry. But there is > > > > Extended Attribute Header Entry with tag 262 (4/14.10). If I handle 262 > > > > entry > > > > as 261, than DVD plays fine, but that is wrong - EA Header is not File > > > > Entry + > > > > some data. It contains data associated with some File Entry, but there > > > > is none. > > > > Therefor this DVD is broken. But ISO 9660 filesystem is ok - kernel > > > > mounts this > > > > DVD and totem can play it (totem don't plays discs directly, but only > > > > mounted). > > > > I can play VOB directly using mplayer, but I can't use dvdnav or some > > > > mplayer front-ends. > > > > This ISO stuff uses correct ISO fs if file search on UDF fails. This > > > > fixes my > > > > problem - and maybe others, too. > > > > > > > > > > I agree completely with your method: accepting tag 262 as valid is plain > > > wrong, and for the rest (without reading the code of iso9660) the code > > > is fine > > > Please, don't top post in mplayerhq mailing lists > > > > The ISO part is programmed using this documentation: > > http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~pje/iso9660.html > > I suppose, that simplified ISO spec is sufficient for DVD video. Moreover > > this > > is only fallback method. > > > > Is there any coding style for dvdnav/dvdread sources? May be GNU indent will > > fix this :). Or did you mean something different as cosmetics? > > > > cosmetics are non-semantic changes; they are fine as long as they are > isolated from semantic changes and as long as they don't change the > style of the enclosing files
Hi, I have sent patch to this list before a long time. I don't know what I should do to see this patch applied. I doubt, that I have rights to send something to dvdnav/dvdread subversion repository. Are there any pending changes, that must be applied before anything else? Is there something I can help with? Regards Jezz _______________________________________________ DVDnav-discuss mailing list DVDnav-discuss@mplayerhq.hu https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/dvdnav-discuss