Ron Notarius W3WN wrote: > Coincidence? > > I have nothing per se against a new entity. It's the process that bothers > me. I'm in favor of open discussion and debate. Now I'm not saying that > anything wrong was done... but I dislike an appearance of impropriety, and > right now, there is (IMHO) such an appearance. > > In the future, I believe open discussion of rules changes should be > undertaken prior to new rules being adopted. > > 73, ron w3wn > C'mon guys. The ARRL leans toward the money. If a group promises donations to the ARRL, then they are very likely to get whatever they want.
-- _ _ _ _ _ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ John L. Sielke ( W )( 2 )( A )( G )( N ) http://w2agn.net \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ http://www.blurty.com/users/w2agn "CRUSTY OLD CURMUDGEON, AND PROUD OF IT" ("AGN" and "AGN?" are Trademarks of John L. Sielke and may not be used without permission) Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
