Hmm that reminds me sometimes when i listen to my fav station(s) as RTM Sarawak, as dedicated fun of Msian music or some other standard QRM outlets that are beyond this post...Luckily 9835 is clear with limited QRM from the nearby freqs
Subject: Re: [HCDX] Observations on Oman, Paul Walker To: "hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com" <hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com>, "Zach" <sordidandsubl...@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2017, 1:11 PM And and on the subject of contact Stations that interfere with one I like... what’s wrong with that? I find something I enjoy, and other stations and harming the Reception.... so I make an effort to have it rectified when I don’t think said Reception of Oman 15140 should be harmed. So what? It didn’t take me but an hour or so to contact the authorities in Cuba and India and right the emails. DXers may not be a Stations target area but if we don’t say something, we never know what the outcome could be. We should never just accept interference just because we are “DX’ers” so I am attempting to do something about it On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:09 AM WHO DARES WINS <broadwin...@msn.com> wrote: > Paul, > > I find it hilariously funny that the same DXer you constantly harass is > the same "full time DXer" whom you emulate daily with your style of > reporting logs, your logging language, and now going as far as telling us > you've been contacting offending stations transmitting on the same > frequency as your beloved 15140, Oman, which your referenced "full time > DXer" has been doing with success daily for years with other stations > causing QRM on the same time and frequency. Many times this "full time DXer > has had much success with stations taking his observations seriously, and > making changes only because he does DX daily as his primary occupation. I > in the past also had many battles with said DXer you mention with continued > venom, but found even though his corrective style at times rubbed me raw, > he was correct in pointing out my wrong logs. Perhaps you as I did can > learn from him and as I did became more careful in my logging entries? > Your continued proclamation of logged headlines of "NEW" DXed stations for > you are and have been reported for years by many others in the Hobby. I'm > not saying that it's not interesting your picking up another NEW station > for you, but for even casual SW DXers these stations usually are easy > catches. Living in the lower 48 makes these stations the norm for most of > us and doesn't generate much in the form of replies from other DX logger's. > I know your a member of NASWA as I once was and you do receive their > weekly SW Flash Sheet which for years has had these same "NEW" stations > listed quite frequently by several part time and full time log reporters > myself included. The only time I ever got responses on my logs were if I > picked up truly new non reported or hard to catch Shortwave stations. > > > John C. > > _ > Hard-Core-DX mailing list > hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx > http://www.hard-core-dx.com/ > _______________________________________________ > > THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed > and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License > published by Michael Stutz at > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html > _ Hard-Core-DX mailing list hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx http://www.hard-core-dx.com/ _______________________________________________ THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License published by Michael Stutz at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html _ Hard-Core-DX mailing list hard-core...@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx http://www.hard-core-dx.com/ _______________________________________________ THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License published by Michael Stutz at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html
