The federal hiring process has three major stumbling blocks. It used to have four. Not that long ago (3-4 yrs) most of the screenig was done by HR folks with no background in ecology/biology. Today, they only check for very basic things and then it is shipped off to the hiring official. The other three are problems for a lot of people. first, military folks get extra points. (if you are 4F or such, your out of luck even if rejected). Second, internal hires will always have an up because they know the system better (I'm talking government internal workings, not hiring system [although that is true too!]). Third, you are going up against a lot of very well qualified people.
The bad thing about government jobs is that you may not have academic freedom to say or do what you want (this is not universal). However, the pay is very good, the co-workers are generally intelligent and well-qualified. There are trade-offs between university research and government research posts. YOu don't have to teach, even if at a university, this can be a plus for some, a negative for others. I have a LOT of friends working in the government (Feds/state) and frankly, I think a lot of the perception regarding positions that are filled before advertising is wrong, at least at the GS13 or below. If they were, I would never have interviewed for any, and I have interviewed for a fer GS13s, turned one down in Washington DC after having visited and realized just how urban it was! (ICK!). Seems like I interviewed for half a dozen positions in ecotox, wildlife conservation, and such over the years, but I cannot recall the exact numbers. I remember being offered one that I was ready to take and it got axed by budgets at the last minute too. That was very disappointing. You have to apply A LOT to get an interview, and don't think it goes to the most qualified applicant, if they don't like the field, they will re-open it and do regularly!!! M On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Dixon, Mark <mark.di...@usd.edu> wrote: > I've never really applied for any of these myself (except perhaps back in the > pre-internet days!), but my understanding is that many applicants end up > being disqualified for federal jobs because they fail to fill in all of the > required information (e.g., beginning and starting dates of positions, etc.). > So, being complete appears to be very important. > > Mark D. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news > [mailto:ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU] On Behalf Of Sharif Branham > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 3:16 PM > To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU > Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] USA jobs: CV vs. Resume > > I agree that a resume with key words is helpful. When appropriate quantify > the relevant experience. (e.g. Five years of lab management, six years of > supervisory experience). Also, it is critical that you follow the application > instructions. Many applicants eliminate themselves by not following > instructions or submitting incomplete applications. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 16, 2013, at 3:46 PM, "Christa Zweig" <czw...@ufl.edu> wrote: > >> It's necessary. There are whole books on the subject. I was directed to the >> one by Kathryn Troutmann, but there might be others. >> -c >> >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> _____ >> Christa Zweig >> Post-doctoral associate >> University of Florida, Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Unit Box >> 110485, Bldg 810 Gainesville, FL 32611-0485 >> 352-870-4132 >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news >> [mailto:ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU] On Behalf Of Brent Bellinger >> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 1:24 PM >> To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU >> Subject: [ECOLOG-L] USA jobs: CV vs. Resume >> >> I am looking for some advice to improve my odds of getting past the initial >> applicant screenings in USA Jobs. As a research scientist, I've put together >> a pretty standard CV, which I've uploaded onto USA jobs and is used when >> applying for research positions. I was told recently by a non-scientist (a >> helicopter mechanic), the key when applying to positions through USA jobs is >> to make sure your resume utilizes key words which helps it rise to the top >> of the applicant list. A CV obviously does not have the depth of detail in >> terms of outlining skills, abilities, knowledge, etc. that a resume usually >> does. I'm wondering if I need to augment my profile and compliment my CV >> with a descriptive resume to help my odds of getting an interview? Is a >> key-word heavy resume a real and necessary thing in USA jobs, or have I just >> had bad luck with the past few positions I've applied to (i.e., they were >> not good fits with my skill set)? >> >> Thanks much for the insight on this matter. >> >> >> Brent Bellinger, Ph.D. >> post doctoral scientist >> U.S. Environmental Protection Agency >> Duluth, MN -- Malcolm L. McCallum Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry School of Biological Sciences University of Missouri at Kansas City Managing Editor, Herpetological Conservation and Biology "Peer pressure is designed to contain anyone with a sense of drive" - Allan Nation 1880's: "There's lots of good fish in the sea" W.S. Gilbert 1990's: Many fish stocks depleted due to overfishing, habitat loss, and pollution. 2000: Marine reserves, ecosystem restoration, and pollution reduction MAY help restore populations. 2022: Soylent Green is People! The Seven Blunders of the World (Mohandas Gandhi) Wealth w/o work Pleasure w/o conscience Knowledge w/o character Commerce w/o morality Science w/o humanity Worship w/o sacrifice Politics w/o principle Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
