Thanks for the reference. However, the idea that this system is 'superior' would depend upon why one is looking for a time reference. If all you want is a relatively high accuracy clock the WWV signal is superior IMO. It certainly is easier to decode! As an added benefit it includes the DST bit -- you never know when the govt will decide to change the DST rules.
If you need to know where you are and have a clear view of the sky your system works well. (As long as I don't have to code the algorithms.) Mark On 4/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark - you are correct... I am just to used to working with the superior > system described at > > http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/sigspec/gpssps1.pdf > > that is only good to about 100 nanoseconds anywhere on the planet, but it has > no clue about DST. The starting and ending dates for DST are easy to > determine if you can figure out which day of the month it is, and what day of > the week it is. > > N7WY > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
