election-methods  

Messages by Thread

• [EM] NYT voting reform dialogue published today. Jameson Quinn
• [EM] My Bucklin multiwinner method turned more sequential Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] My Bucklin multiwinner method turned more sequential Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] My Bucklin multiwinner method turned more sequential Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] My Bucklin multiwinner method turned more sequential Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Jameson: I thought you said that people can safely rate sincerely in MJ. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Further comments to Kristofer's MJ posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Further comments to Kristofer's MJ posting Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Poll on favorite voting methods Andrew Myers
• [EM] Re, take 2: NYT/Richie voting reform "debate" next Sunday; write in. David L Wetzell
• [EM] NYT/Richie voting reform "debate" next Sunday; write in. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] NYT/Richie voting reform "debate" next Sunday; write in. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] NYT/Richie voting reform "debate" next Sunday; write in. David L Wetzell
• Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 92, Issue 55 David L Wetzell
• [EM] MJ, Kristofer MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. David L Wetzell
• Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Bryan Mills
• Re: [EM] Kevin V David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Kevin V Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Kristofer: MJ & RV MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: MJ & RV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: MJ & RV Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] Kristofer: MJ & RV MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] FW: Kristofer: MJ & RV MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Jameson MJ. Alternative IC rule? ICT's main problem. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] <ref> tags on electowiki? Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Re Raph Frank wrt 3-seat LR Hare and RV for US Senators by proxy. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Re Raph Frank wrt 3-seat LR Hare and RV for US Senators by proxy. Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] Re Raph Frank wrt 3-seat LR Hare and RV for US Senators by proxy. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Re Raph Frank wrt 3-seat LR Hare and RV for US Senators by proxy. Kevin Venzke
• [EM] "Semi-honest criterion"? Jameson Quinn
• [EM] FYI: Wikipedia table of criteria compliances Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Range Voting for State Representative election of US Senators. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Range Voting for State Representative election of US Senators. Raph Frank
• Re: [EM] STV+AV (Raph Frank) David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV (Raph Frank) Raph Frank
• [EM] Jameson: Repeating my statements MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Jameson: Repeating my statements Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Universality of top-count-conditionality. MTAOC alone. Stepwise-When-Necessary. Conditional in Condorcet? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] Kevin V. wrt anti-Approval Voting. David L Wetzell
• Re: [EM] not fair. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] not fair. David L Wetzell
• [EM] brainstorm'n electoral calculus on acid... David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] brainstorm'n electoral calculus on acid... Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] brainstorm'n electoral calculus on acid... David L Wetzell
• Re: [EM] RBJ et al. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] RBJ et al. Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Jameson: MJ MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Jameson: MJ Jameson Quinn
• [EM] "Compliant SODA?": seeking a SODA version which may meet more criteria Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] "Compliant SODA?": seeking a SODA version which may meet more criteria Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] "Compliant SODA?": seeking a SODA version which may meet more criteria Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Declaration update: Announcing Facebook page and BanSingleMarkBallots.org website Richard Fobes
• [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Sparring over AV vs IRV at Least of All Evils... Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] re Unger wrt tabulation David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] re Unger wrt tabulation robert bristow-johnson
  • [EM] re Unger wrt tabulation David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] re Unger wrt tabulation robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Top-majority options for Approval? An alternative 3-slot option. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 92, Issue 17 David L Wetzell
• [EM] proposal for posting style Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] proposal for posting style Jameson Quinn
• Re: [EM] Unger, wrt tabulation. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Unger, wrt tabulation. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Unger, wrt tabulation. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Unger, wrt tabulation. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Unger, wrt tabulation. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Unger, wrt tabulation. robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Unger, wrt tabulation. robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] When wouldn't SODA elect the CW? Jameson Quinn
• Re: [EM] STV+AV Bryan Mills
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Ken & Karla
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Raph Frank
  • [EM] STV+AV Bryan Mills
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Bryan Mills
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Bryan Mills
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV Raph Frank
• [EM] Re STV+AV David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Re STV+AV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Re STV+AV David L Wetzell
• [EM] SODA criteria Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] SODA criteria Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] SODA criteria Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] SODA criteria Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] SODA criteria Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] SODA criteria Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] SODA criteria Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] SODA criteria Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] SODA criteria Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] SODA criteria Jameson Quinn
• [EM] STV+AV. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV. robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] STV+AV. Bryan Mills
• [EM] SODA is monotonic. Earlier failure/fix was actually for participation, not monotononicity. Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Gaming the Vote Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] Gaming the Vote robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Gaming the Vote Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Gaming the Vote Ted Stern
• [EM] Contextuality determines relative import of criterion. David L Wetzell
• [EM] Kevin: Majority Judgement MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Kevin: Majority Judgement Jameson Quinn
• [EM] AERLO probably spoils FBC compliance. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Majority Judgement MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Re : Majority Judgement Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Majority Judgement Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Majority Judgement Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Majority Judgement Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Majority Judgement Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] Fwd: Majority Judgement Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Which matters more: Getting/Figuring Out the Best Single-Winner Rule or Incorporating More Multi-Winner Rules ASAP in the US? David L Wetzell
• [EM] Propose plain Approval first. Option enhancements can be later proposals. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Propose plain Approval first. Option enhancements can be later proposals. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Propose plain Approval first. Option enhancements can be later proposals. Juho Laatu
  • [EM] Looking at Condorcet Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet Andy Jennings
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet Andy Jennings
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4431] Looking at Condorcet Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4433] Looking at Condorcet Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4435] Looking at Condorcet - Runoffs Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4433] Looking at Condorcet - Recounting Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4437] Re: Looking at Condorcet Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Andy Jennings
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Andy Jennings
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson

• Earlier messages