Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Wed, May 30, 2007: > Jonas Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Ok, thanks for the warning, however, I thought that I expressed that I > > do not really consider ECMAScript related crashes as something to worry > > about for the current stable version. > > 2007-05-27: > <paakku> fonseca: Should bug 755 be fixed in 0.11.3.GIT or 0.11.4.GIT? > <fonseca> paakku: I don't really care about ECMAScript bugs. > > Crashes caused by dangling pointers may be exploitable (unlike > crashes caused by null pointers). I think they should be fixed > regardless of whether they occur in ECMAScript support or > elsewhere in ELinks. And I especially don't want to become > responsible of making a release crash more than the previous one.
Fair enough. I guess my reason for not caring stems from the feeling of ECMAScript being pushed too soon before it was even half decent. Perhaps those days are over. ;) > > I will try to find time to release 0.11.4 in the start of June. > > I don't think I'll be able to fix things properly before that, > so I have now reverted the two commits from elinks-0.11. Ok, cool. Will try to find time to do the preparations for .4 -- Jonas Fonseca _______________________________________________ elinks-dev mailing list elinks-dev@linuxfromscratch.org http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev