On Mon 18 Jan 2010 at 16:29:43 PST G. Sebastin Pedersen wrote: >On 1/18/10, Charlie Kester <corky1...@comcast.net> wrote: >> On Mon 18 Jan 2010 at 14:24:51 PST Chris Jones wrote: >>>On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 03:59:17AM EST, Witold Filipczyk wrote: >>> >>>> Anyway, ELinks seems dead. >>> >>>If that turns out to be the case, that's bad news. >> >> What's behind this rumor? >> >> If elinks is "dead", what replaces it? >> _______________________________________________ >> elinks-users mailing list >> elinks-users@linuxfromscratch.org >> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-users >> >It would be a really sad news... I'm a big fan and estusiasic user... >all the way from Argentina.
I agree that this would be sad news indeed, since there is no other textmode browser that matches elinks in its feature set. But even if it really is dead, we can continue using elinks. "Dead" simply means that there won't be any more work done to add features or fix bugs. Still, I'm hoping this is nothing more than a rumor. _______________________________________________ elinks-users mailing list elinks-users@linuxfromscratch.org http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-users
