On 2007-07-12 03:55 +0200, Kenichi Handa wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I configured XTerm and Emacs to use the same font with same size as
>> follows:
>
>> in .Xresources:
>
>> XTerm*faceName: xft:monospace:pixelsize=16
>> XTerm*faceNameDoublesize: fzsongti
>> Emacs.Font: monospace:pixelsize=16
>
>> in .emacs:
>
>> (when window-system
>> (set-fontset-font (frame-parameter nil 'font)
>> 'han '("FZSongTi" . "unicode-bmp")))
>
>> And then I compared Chinese characters in 'emacs -nw' running in xterm
>> and emacs running in X11. It turns out Chinese characters are
>> substantially smaller in Emacs running in X11.
>
>> However, C-u C-x = shows that the characters have pixelsize 16. Is this
>> a bug?
>
> I'm not sure. Is the font size of ASCII characters the same
> in emacs and xterm?
>
> Could you please check the actual pixel size of a Chinese
> character by, for instance, xmag?
>
> ---
> Kenichi Handa
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It appears that Chinese characters have pixelsize 16 in Emacs &
rxvt-unicode & gnome-terminal but have a larger pixelsize in gedit &
xterm.
I am running Fedora 7.
HTH,
--
Leo <sdl.web AT gmail.com> (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
