S> IIRC, the order is fixed by the relevant RFC, so we can't really let the S> user mess it up.
We demand shoot-feet control. Actually here we are smarter than the RFC. RFC? bah! KFChicken. S> As for making 21 customizable, well.... it seems like a good value, what S> with it being half of 42 and just old enough to drink: why would you want to S> change it? Imagine me, spartan header environmental enthusiast, spewing out mails with an ever growing pile of References, as if I was not in control of my computer. The next thing you know I would be plastering on some HTML too, or signatures, or GPG, or "Get Yahoo!" against my will. One Reference is enough. Would go leave home with some beehive hairdo of headers? _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug