> oldest 21 rather than the most recent 21? That would indeed be a plain bug.
But that is what Lars said the RFC said the last time I brought this up. Which you can see somewhere in news://news.gnus.org/gnus.gnus-bug which is what http://gnus.org/resources.html says is the only way to see gnus bug reports. Better add a nil/t defvar so the user can override the order just in case Lars wasn't joking. > While 21 references is probably always overkill, 1 is not always enough, OK, make you a deal: 20, or OK, 25, anything, as long as you have a defvar so the user can override it -- allow him as big a beehive hairdo of references as he wants. Make 0 mean no references at all. I mean hardwiring any number without a defvar alternative should raise a red flag anyway. Anyway, thanks for your persistence in this matter. Farther than I got last time just posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
