On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Peter Rice <ricepet...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Dear Daniel, > > > On 18/09/2012 03:00, Rozenbaum, Daniel (Biocceleration Inc) wrote: >> >> Greetings again, >> >> If I may, another question on the issue of IG format: how difficult would >> it be to support database indexing for this format? > > > Very easy, a 1-day job including testing and documentation. > > Could you please make some example data available, and indicate which fields > could be indexed (including any information in formatted descriptions or in > naming conventions), and suggest a format name (e.g. USPTO or > Biocceleration)
Does it need a new format name? EMBOSS already defines "ig" and "igstrict" - do the USPTO files diverge from these? Peter C. P.S. Biopython also uses the format name "ig", based on the current EMBOSS terminology. _______________________________________________ EMBOSS mailing list EMBOSS@lists.open-bio.org http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/emboss
