On 12 Apr 2012, at 08:04, Kenneth Lerman <kenneth.ler...@se-ltd.com> wrote:
> I think the answer is that he "wants to go back to (for example) just > before the tool broke". I don't think a user would describe what he > wants as skip the parts that worked up until the tool broke and continue > from there. The most reliable way to recover the above situation is to cut all the moves that worked out of the G-code and re-run, and a lot of users do just that. So it seems to me that users are already intuitively doing the first option. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
