-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 9/15/2012 1:10 PM, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> Absolutely, and this is why I'm spending some time with this board.
> It already works fine for me in a traditional RTAI-based LinuxCNC
> system. I decided to play with it because of the general, 
> well-founded belief among our users that Atom boards work great. 
> Inquiring minds (well, at least mine) want to know if this is true
>  with alternative realtime O/Ses. If LinuxCNC over Xenomai or RT 
> PREEMPT Linux is to go forward, the users will need lists of boards
> that work, possibly more finely classified as to potential use than
> is our current latency-test results table.

Indeed.  If you don't mind, when you get some latency numbers you have
confidence in, please add them to the preempt_rt page:

> http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Debian_Wheezy_Linux-Rt_Compile_LinuxCNC
> 
I am interested in the performance of as many hardware test-points
as I can get, but currently only have about three fundamentally
different platform machines I can put through the paces (one has yet
to be tested, the other two are the entries I made on the wiki page,
above).

- -- 
Charles Steinkuehler
char...@steinkuehler.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlBU4REACgkQLywbqEHdNFyBngCgqpKzdG36TSgw1maZkmE0J0d6
aY0An38x8bpmKliByvqJqGTQSTm9D7PI
=lJ/w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How fast is your code?
3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t know how their code performs in production.
Find out how slow your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219672;13503038;z?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to