On 8/10/22 12:36, Hans Unzner wrote:
I agree that the meeting was not really effective. In my opinion we have
to think about the topics we want to discuss in advance and put them on
the agenda. And also limit the time.
The audio and video is often a problem at those meetings. Maybe we
should spend some time to check that before we actually start the
discussion.
We can collect ideas for the agenda in the Google document, linked
below. But I'm not sure if everyone with the link has write access to
that. Can you try that?
Am 10.08.22 um 19:10 schrieb Chris Morley:
I unfortunately found the meeting frustrating. The audio was unusable
about 50% of the time.
For mw,It got to the point it was useless to continue trying.
Not sure if it was on my end or if there were any other options.
Seb did mention he had some trouble too.
Next meeting:
Is there a way to post small writeups of subjects keen to be discussed?
I had opinions on 2.9 release but could not be heard?
Thanks for organising the meeting. Nice to see a try on an organised
direction again :)
Last time we decided we wanted a more formal meeting structure, we did
it this way: http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?MeetingsOnIRC
IRC in 2013 was way more reliable that video chats in 2022, but perhaps
less accessible to folks who are not used to it.
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
