> So Object.type is the thing to draft. Probably it should return typeof-like > strings with the "null" fix and only that. I do not believe it should start > returning "array" for Array instances, or take other experimental risks. But > we should discuss.
FWIW: I’ve written down all typeof use cases that I could come up with: http://www.2ality.com/2012/01/typeof-use-cases.html A way of returning [[class]] would be great. Any reason why such a function couldn’t be merged with Object.type()? My attempt at implementing such a merged function (along with a detailed rationale – I prefer returning "Array" to returning "array") is documented here: http://www.2ality.com/2011/11/improving-typeof.html -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer a...@rauschma.de home: rauschma.de twitter: twitter.com/rauschma blog: 2ality.com _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
