Darren Worrall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Some notes have been posted about the network at this years Pycon:
> http://www.tummy.com/Community/Articles/pycon2010-network/
>
> I'm not sure how much of it is relevant to us, or how it compared to
> last years EP network, but it's worth a read by whoever has
> responsibility for the network this year - the wireless breakdown is
> pretty interesting. Headlines: Half of the audience were using
> 802.11n, 5.2GHz scales better and is much more reliable than 2.4GHz.
>
I've been responsible for the tech team at PyConUK and EuroPython for
the past
few years.

Initially two bonded ADSL lines were installed by a Guadec Conference
and taken
over by us and subsequently the Conservatoire.

At the beginning all cabling and positioning of access points was ad
hoc, and
in-fill where coverage was lacking was made during the event.

In recent years the Conservatoire has taken over the infrastructure and
placed
access points within ceilings etc.

Last year we were not allowed to have access to the comms room, were not
given
passwords to the routers and were not allowed to put flying ethernet
cables in
place, and could not fill in holes and in particular couldn't put extra
access points in the Adrian Boult Hall. All this lead to much frustration.

For this year we are planning to have a completely new set-up with our
own broadband lines, 802.11n access points and possibly a mesh network,
or failing that wireless bridging. Ideally this will be independent of
the Conservatoire's infrastructure.

The PyCon 2010 comments on the reliability of 2.4 GHz are not really
accurate because as far as I am aware they are still configuring their
access points with unique essid's, rather than having a single essid
common to all access points. This means that roaming doesn't work
properly and in particular the number of dchp requests is excessive.

More people in the USA have new machines with 802.11n because the price
of hardware in real terms is much less than in the UK.

Additional thoughts and assistance is welcomed!!

Cheers,

Q



_______________________________________________
Europython-improve mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython-improve

Reply via email to