On 11/29/2023 5:46 PM, Jason Resch wrote:


On Wed, Nov 29, 2023, 8:39 PM Bruce Kellett <bhkellet...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 11:59 AM Jason Resch
    <jasonre...@gmail.com> wrote:

        On Wed, Nov 29, 2023, 7:17 PM Bruce Kellett
        <bhkellet...@gmail.com> wrote:

            On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:49 PM Stathis Papaioannou
            <stath...@gmail.com> wrote:

                On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 12:34, Bruce Kellett
                <bhkellet...@gmail.com> wrote:

                    On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 12:02 PM Stathis
                    Papaioannou <stath...@gmail.com> wrote:


                        The Born rule allows you to calculate the
                        probability of what outcome you will see in a
                        Universe where all outcomes occur.


                    You are still conflating incompatible theories.
                    The Born rule is a rule for calculating
                    probabilities from the wave function -- it says
                    nothing about worlds or existence. MWI is a theory
                    about the existence of many worlds. These theories
                    are incompatible, and should not be conflated.


                “The Born rule is a rule for calculating probabilities
                from the wave function -- it says nothing about worlds
                or existence”  -and- “MWI is a theory about the
                existence of many worlds” are not incompatible statements.


            Perhaps that is the wrong way to look at it. The linearity
            of the Schrodinger equation implies that the individuals
            on all branches are the same: there is nothing to
            distinguish one of them as "you" and the others as mere
            shadows or zombies. In other words, they are all "you". So
            you are the person on the branch with all spins up and
            your probability of seeing this result is one, since this
            branch certainly exists, and, by linearity, "you" are the
            individual on that branch. This is inconsistent with the
            claim that the Born rule gives the probability that "you"
            will see some particular result. As we have seen, the
            probability that "you" will see all ups in one, whereas
            the Born probability for this result is 1/2^N. These
            probability estimates are incompatible.



        According to relativity you exist in all times across your
        lifespan (and all times are equally really). Yet you are only
        ever aware of being in one time and in one place. I think this
        tells us more about the limitations of our neurology than it
        reveals about the extent or nature of reality. If a copy of me
        is created on Mars, the me know Earth doesn't magically become
        aware of it.


    And how do we select out the present moment from the block universe?


I believe all apparent selections are merely indexical illusions. 'Here' is no more real than 'There', 'Now' is no more real than 'Then', 'I' is no more real than 'Him'. We only consider these things special due to the position we happen to be in at the time a consideration is made, but all such considerations exist and are equally valid. All 'Heres' are real, all 'Nows' are real, all points of view are 'Is'. Only, as Shrodigner says, we aren't in a position to survey them all at once.

But if somebody drops a bomb on there and you're here and not there you may find it makes  a difference.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/d9f3533b-019f-4c81-a12d-2a7afd5ec264%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to