Excellent. I don't care about offline usage so this is a big net win for me (pun intended :-).
poc On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 12:53 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > No it shouldn't be your imagination, it should be noticably faster for > most users. > > Not to say there aren't new bugs now (offline seems a bit iffy for > example) ... but the code was re-done to remove a badly thought-out > implementation that seemed the right way to go at the time. And some > locking was tuned to help reduce unecessary contention for locally > available resources. > > On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 00:13 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Just so you guys don't think I do nothing but complain, let me say that > > I installed 2.3.7 an hour ago and seem to be seeing a dramatic > > improvement in startup speed for my (large) IMAP mailboxes. Evo was > > always very noticeably slower than TBird but that gap has closed > > significantly or disappeared entirely. > > > > Or is this just my fevered imagination? > > > > poc > > > > _______________________________________________ > > evolution maillist - evolution@lists.ximian.com > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - evolution@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
