On Wed, 2005-17-08 at 12:53 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > Not to say there aren't new bugs now (offline seems a bit iffy for > example) ...
What's the prognosis on that, Michael? Is that in the release critical category, or a "yeah, whatever. We'll get to it eventually". [As you'll recall, the offline use case has been my bugaboo for years now; when I saw you were redoing the IMAP code I became hopeful, but unfortunately there has been great cause for skepticism in the past. I would dearly love to stop mucking about with offlineimap / getmail / fetchmail / ssh tunnels etc and just use Evo, period - but the bar is high. I will NOT be caught again an hour out over the Pacific only to discover Evo won't allow me to access IMAP messages that it perfectly well has cached but, since it wasn't in "offline" mode when last disconnected, it couldn't figure out it had. That made me very grumpy. :|] Anyway, it's your call whether or not it's a priority - I'm just curious. AfC Sydney -- Andrew Frederick Cowie Technology strategy, managing change, establishing procedures, and executing successful upgrades to mission critical business infrastructure. http://www.operationaldynamics.com/ Sydney New York Toronto London _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
