Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:14 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>
>> But it does mean usurping the possible definition of
>> ipv6_addr_loopback() in the O/S for the one in OFED, for whatever that's
>> worth.
>>
>
>
Actually - that's OK, since the problem arises from the fact that the
backport file contains the definition because older versions of
SLES10SP2 didn't. You're basically replacing the kernel header
definition (in newer SLES10SP2 kernels) with the identical definition.
Jon - do you think we should have Vlad pull this patch?
Thanks.
-jeff
> And just to further reply to myself, this patch appears to do the job,
> although I have to admit not being able to do any testing with ipv6 at
> all:
>
> --- kernel_addons/backport/2.6.16_sles10_sp2/include/net/ipv6.h.old
> 2009-11-03 14:17:26.000000000 -0500
> +++ kernel_addons/backport/2.6.16_sles10_sp2/include/net/ipv6.h
> 2009-11-20 10:23:12.000000000 -0500
> @@ -18,10 +18,12 @@
> (a->s6_addr32[2] ^ htonl(0x0000ffff))) == 0);
> }
>
> -static inline int ipv6_addr_loopback(const struct in6_addr *a)
> +static inline int __ipv6_addr_loopback(const struct in6_addr *a)
> {
> return ((a->s6_addr32[0] | a->s6_addr32[1] |
> a->s6_addr32[2] | (a->s6_addr32[3] ^ htonl(1))) == 0);
> }
>
> +#define ipv6_addr_loopback(a) __ipv6_addr_loopback(a)
> +
> #endif
>
>
_______________________________________________
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
