Jakob Hirsch wrote: Ok, since nobody objected (or nobody were interested), I made a small patch (attached) it ran fine on my system the last days.
> Looking at the code in spam.c and the spamd interface, it seems easy to > solve this: Send the recipients in a Envelope-To (or something else, Even easier: There's already code for it in spool_mbox.c, but it put only a single recipient into the header ($received_for). I changed this to $recipients. The only problem is a probably very long line, but that seems to be no problem for spamd (at least in my tests). > spamd recognizes it as a header belonging to the message. (The same > could've been done for the envelope-sender, but it's not of much Even that is already there, so the changed Received: header was not necessary (for spamd).
--- exim-snapshot/src/spool_mbox.c +++ exim-snapshot.jh1/src/spool_mbox.c @@ -90,11 +90,11 @@ }; }; /* Generate X-Envelope-To header */ - envelope_to = expand_string(US"${if def:received_for{$received_for}}"); + envelope_to = expand_string(US"${recipients}"); if (envelope_to != NULL) { if (envelope_to[0] != 0) { uschar *my_envelope_to; - my_envelope_to = string_sprintf("X-Envelope-To: <%s>\n", envelope_to); + my_envelope_to = string_sprintf("X-Envelope-To: %s\n", envelope_to); i = fwrite(my_envelope_to, 1, Ustrlen(my_envelope_to), mbox_file); if (i != Ustrlen(my_envelope_to)) { debug_printf("error/short write on writing in: %s", mbox_path);
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/