Bill Hacker wrote: >> bad idea. While RFC 2476 does not explicitly specify it, all >> installations I know of use STARTTLS.
"on this port", that is. > We have the "luxury" of not having to cater to WinWoes or Apple 'native' > alleged-MUA's, and use different SSL arrival ports for: > - faster setup than STARTTLS I use the smtps port (465) for this. > - helping 'ban' MUA's we don't want to support anyway By requiring immediate TLS instead of STARTTLS? Interesting. Last time I checked, OE supported only the former of both. > - selecting different acl routing rules for different user groups Depending on the incoming port? Sounds not very reliable. Anyway, I'd rather use some arbitrary port for this than abuse a well-known port. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
