On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 22:03, James Sparenberg wrote: > On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 09:05, Michael Adams wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 18:56:16 +0200 > > "T. Ribbrock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > In fact, if you leave reply-to unset, all replies to mail > > > > you send will be sent back to the address you are sending from, > > > > except in such cases as the mailing lists, where replies ought to > > > > be automatically sent to the list, not you. The list is a public > > > > forum, not a private resource. > > > > > > I agree, but to me, the principle of "least surprise" works the other > > > way round: If I hit "reply", I expect to reply to the sender, not the > > > list - that's the way it always works. > > > In my case, if I want to reply to the list, I hit "list-reply", not > > > "reply". > > > > <snip> > > > > You know most MUA's don't have a "list reply", dont you? And i am not > > just referring to Outl*.* > > Went from vi to mail to pine to Eudora to Sylpheed/Evolution. Somehow I > missed mutt.
I tried it a few times, never liked it enough to keep it though. Reminds me of emacs (in that the tool is more complicated than the task). -- Jack Coates Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
