Aha! How could I rewrite for-all? so that it prints the first stack that
fails the predicate?
Cheers,
Andrew Pennebaker
www.yellosoft.us
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Joe Groff <arc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 24, 2011, at 10:05 PM, Andrew Pennebaker wrote:
>
> Joe, your for-all? looks promising (and it's incredibly short). However,
> when I try it, I'm still getting that macro error.
>
>
> In your "main" you missed the [ ] around prop-even. This line:
>
> https://github.com/mcandre/factcheck/blob/master/example.factor#L12
>
> should read:
>
> [ prop-even ] [ gen-even ] for-all? .
>
> -Joe
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K
> The only unified storage solution that offers unified management
> Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient.
> Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Factor-talk mailing list
> Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K
The only unified storage solution that offers unified management
Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient.
Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
