Judy, I haven't looked into the technical stuff, though I know that you have and are, if not convinced of the assertion that they are the product of aliens, certainly more inclined to think that there are non-human origins of at least some of the art. For myself, the constructions I've seen (several score) don't appear to have been particularly difficult to make, and the "aesthetic" they reveal seems emminently human, rather than non-human.
** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis" <reavismarek@> wrote: > > > > Nablusoss1008, crop circles are cool, no doubt about > > that, and I always enjoy the pictures you post. Only > > there's nothing convincing (to me) that they are > > anything but the product of human artifice. > > Have you ever looked at any of the technical work > that's been done, Marek? > > > My disbelief in their non-human origin doesn't detract > > my appreciation of them. > > As it happens, I think "aliens" is the *least* likely > explanation for the origin of crop circles. But there's > some awfully interesting data of various kinds that > seems to support the idea that not all of them were > made by humans. > > If they weren't all made by humans, and none of them > was made by aliens, what does that leave us with? > > Damned if I know. >
