Thanks for the site, I'll check it out sometime. **
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis" <reavismarek@> wrote: > > > > Judy, I haven't looked into the technical stuff, though > > I know that you have and are, if not convinced of the > > assertion that they are the product of aliens, > > Pretty well convinced they're *not* the product of > aliens, actually. > > > certainly more inclined to think that there are non-human > > origins of at least some of the art. For myself, the > > constructions I've seen (several score) don't appear to > > have been particularly difficult to make, and the > > "aesthetic" they reveal seems emminently human, rather > > than non-human. > > Agreed about the "aesthetic." However, some of them seem > to be more mathematical than aesthetic per se. Not that > mathematics doesn't have a beauty accessible to the human > mind, but mathematical structures, and their "aesthetic," > presumably exist independently of human conception. > > Not at all sure there aren't some circles that would have > been awfully tough to make in the time available (in > midsummer in Great Britain, where some very complex > circles have appeared overnight, there's only about four > hours of darkness in which to make them without being > spotted--and there are lots of watchers these days hoping > to catch them at it). > > There are other factors, though, in some of the circles > that don't seem to have been found in those known to have > been made by humans, including altered molecular structure > of the plants, microwave radiation, changes in the > crystalline scructure of the soil inside the circles, and > so on, stuff you wouldn't know about without scientific > analysis in a lab and that doesn't appear to have an > ordinary explanation. > > If you're ever curious, this would be the place to start > checking it out: > > http://www.bltresearch.com/index.php > > Plus which, people have had quite a few very odd > experiences inside some of the circles, and there's > been some weird animal behavior as well. There's just > a great deal of *strangeness* associated with some > of the circles. > > BTW, when I say "nonhuman origin," I mean mechanically > speaking, i.e., not a bunch of folks with ropes and > boards tramping down the crops in the middle of the > night. >
