Jeff Whitaker [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> If it doesn't actually need openssl (library-wise or otherwise) then it
> shouldn't depend on it. The problem that Martin uncovered is a serious one
> - having kdebindings depend on openssl is causing fink to try to install
> conflicting packages.  So, if removing the un-needed openssl dependency
> prevents this from happening I think it needs to be done.

Yeah, makes sense.  Should it still stay in crypto?  It's unable to install if
it's in main and you don't have crypto in your list, but it doesn't directly
use crypto itself.

-- 
Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://ranger.befunk.com/
I'm not a robot like you. I don't like having disks crammed into me... unless
they're Oreos, and then only in the mouth. -- Fry, on _Futurama_


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to