On Jul 5,2002 13:43:06 -0600, Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Benjamin Reed wrote:
>
>> Jeff Whitaker [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>> > If it doesn't actually need openssl (library-wise or otherwise) then it
>> > shouldn't depend on it. The problem that Martin uncovered is a serious one
>> > - having kdebindings depend on openssl is causing fink to try to install
>> > conflicting packages. So, if removing the un-needed openssl dependency
>> > prevents this from happening I think it needs to be done.
>>
>> Yeah, makes sense. Should it still stay in crypto? It's unable to install if
>> it's in main and you don't have crypto in your list, but it doesn't directly
>> use crypto itself.
>>
>>
>
>It only needs to be in crypto if it actually uses the crypto functions in
>Mozilla.
>
>-Jeff
It seems to me that if package foo Depends on package bar, and package bar is
in crypto, then package foo has to be in crypto too. Otherwise people not
having crypto will try to install something and have unmet dependencies.
-- Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
