> On May 25, 2017, at 22:33, Daniel Macks <dma...@netspace.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 25 May 2017 15:29:38 -0700, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> 
>>> 
>>>> On May 25, 2017, at 14:58, Philip Lamb  wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Scanning binaries for incorrect dyld linking...
>>>> /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/objdump:
>>>>  'aclocal.m4': The file was not recognized as a valid object file
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Start by updating fink-package-precedence. After Apple changed the behavior 
>>> of ‘otool’, fink-package-precedence was updated to use ‘otool-classic’ 
>>> instead, which has the classic behavior of not erroring out when 
>>> encountering a non-object file.  atk1 doesn’t have a versioned build 
>>> dependency on fink-package-precedence (yet), so it won’t automatically 
>>> update the latter’s version.
> 
> Assuming your diagnosis is correct, which sounds likely, I don't think this 
> is specific to atk1 (it's just "whatever $user happened to try to update 
> first"), so no sense having a versioned bdep for f-p-p. Given how widespread 
> f-p-p is at low-level parts of so many packages, should it become an 
> Essential:yes package so that these updates get propagated more promptly to 
> users?
> 
> dan
> 

Yeah, that’d make sense.  

—akh


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/mailman/fink-users/
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to