22.03.2012 13:00, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote: > * Under the assumption that SS as a single-process model with it's > shared cache supports SMP (I think this was a primarly goal) in 3.0 like > SC in 2.5, I don't see a reason to offer SC in 3.0 at all (at least the > SC terminology; which already shows up in the missing SC part in "instsvc")?
Personally, I agree. But we need to hear other opinions as well. > * Or are there any benefits running a non-shared cache single-process > model against the shared cache counterpart? A shared cache model IMHO > offers a more predictable way for system operations from a page cache > (RAM) usage POV It would depend on how good the new SS handles the scalability with different cache sizes. > * Unlike InterBase customers, I guess Classic won't be abonded, cause > current Firebird customers still want the per-connection fail-resistant > sandbox behaviour Correct. > * How does Embedded 3.0 fit in here? SS still with the shared database > option? firebird.conf dictates the rules here. SharedDatabase should depend exclusively on whether you need multiple application accessing the database or not. SharedCache should be ideally always on, but currently the SharedDatabase+SharedCache mode is not reliable and it has very questionable performance benefits (if any), so perhaps SharedCache should depend on your SharedDatabase choice. Dmitry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
