On 27/08/2013 16:26, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 27.08.2013 20:22, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >> The user issue is about managing the internal generator. >> >> You can do it now, but you need to discover its internal name. >> >> Why complicate things? > Complication is managing identity columns via generator. Every operation > should be > performed on the column itself. Just in case if some future version of > Firebird will be > able to support identity column without generator behind it. > Why do a future version will go against the SQL standard?
Adriano ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
