On 01/16/17 20:57, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > On 16/01/2017 15:40, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> On 01/15/17 21:00, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >> I like the suggestion in general but some details worth thinking more. > Sure. It's yet more an general idea than a proposal. > > What I like about it, it's much simple in relation to what we have now > while fixing the problems. > > Another gray area is how to support AFTER DDL triggers, who are supposed > to see changes in RDB$ tables.
Make all transaction work with virtual metadata? > >> Returning to 'allow concurrent transactions to change the same objects'. >> What if both transactions create same objects or any other phase 1 >> conflict? >> First committed wins? > Yes. That's OK for me. >> PS. We had more or less same suggestion from Jim >10 years ago (well, no >> word 'Virtual' was said that time) but it did not go out of generic >> discussion phaze. > I don't remember it. Not strange - I suppose you've started to actively participate in firebird project later. Please see: https://sourceforge.net/p/firebird/mailman/message/17072360/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
