For me it's ok dropping 3.5 support - we took 4.0 when 2.0 support was dropped.
4.0 support would be very appreciated. I'll take a look right after delivering our update end of the week. Thank you for your work! André Litfin > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jiri Cincura [mailto:disk...@cincura.net] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. November 2013 16:16 > An: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers > Betreff: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Connection pool bug > > OK guys. First thanks for the support. It's not an easy change and there's a lot > of code already and I need to squeeze myself in, with my concept. But here > are some first numbers: > > * [1] With connection pooling ON and OLD provider the application gained > about 276KB in ~30 minutes. > * [2] With connection pooling OFF and OLD provider the application gained > 324 bytes in ~30 minutes. > * [3] With connection pooling ON and OLD provider and explicitly cleaning the > pool the application gained about 1KB in ~33 minutes. > * [4] With connection pooling ON and NEW provider the application > *lost* about 2KB in ~30 minutes. > > The application I'm using is not 100% deterministic. It's doing network > requests and running some timers. So it pretty much depends when the > snapshot was taken. I think results are looking good. The [2] and [4] are > basically same, similar [3] and [4]. > > The tests are all green and the test application (obviously) is not crashing. > That gives me like 50% confidence. :) You can find the build here > https://copy.com/Jh2ebP2sPjyv (.NET 4.5). It has same version number, it's > using same sources, only the connection pooling has been altered. Thus you > can just drop it in your application and try it run. > Or create new and stress it. Whatever you want. I'd like to hear feedback > from your. Even if it's just one quick run, let me know. It will speed up the > deploy greatly. > > Also. Backporting the feature to .NET 4.0 is going to be easy. To 3.5 harder, > because I rely on ConcurrentDictionary that's in 4.0 and newer. Bummer. > Ideas? Drop 3.5 support? I can implement it on my own with locking (just for > 3.5), but is it worth it? > > -- > Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) http://blog.cincura.net/ | > http://www.ID3renamer.com > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps > OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access Free > app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server. > Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clk > trk > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server. Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
