On 9/18/06, Axel Liljencrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/17/06, Beni Cherniavsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Duh, I should have checked before complaining. I feel like > > contributing now. I went through the documentation of the builtins > > and externals and made small improvements (darcs diff -u attached): > > The patch is highly appriciated. I looked at the it and it seems to > contain many much needed links and corrections. > > I'm very sorry to be a bother, but if it is possible, could you resend > the patch as a darcs-style email bundle instead (Use the 'darcs send' > subsommand). That makes it easier for me to apply the patch, since > Darcs patches are much better at handling local changes I've made but > not applied. Your identity as the originator of the patch is also > preserved, which should give you a warm mushy feeling. :-)
I applied the original patch, there wheren't that many conflicts. No need to send a modified version. -- Axel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
