Yes indeed! David Adam zanc...@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Diego Zamboni wrote: > I think the "complete" inside the function should be "builtin complete" > to ensure the native function is called. > > --Diego > > > On Nov 10, 2014, at 1:59 AM, David Adam <zanc...@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> wrote: > > > > Presumably you could do something like this: > > > > ``` > > function complete > > complete --authoritative $argv > > end > > funcsave complete > > ``` > > > > I have not tested this. Make backups and ensure you have an alternative > > shell installed and enabled if you are going to try it, because you might > > need to delete ~/.config/fish/functions/complete.fish. > > > > [DAA] > > > > On Wed, 5 Nov 2014, Santhosh T wrote: > > > >> HI David, > >> > >> so the feature is there. is there any way to make authoritative by default > >> explicitly > >> > >> - santhosh > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:24 AM, David Adam <zanc...@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> This functionality was altered before the release of fish 2.0.0. > >>> > >>> Commit 6eb66770a49944 [1] makes completions non-authoritative by default. > >>> If you pass the `--authoritative` argument to your completions, the > >>> behaviour you describe will return. However, this is not enabled for > >>> completions shipped with fish because of the difficulty in maintaining > >>> parity between these completions and the upstream program. > >>> > >>> With the next release of fish, a supported path for completions shipped by > >>> upstream vendors will be available; these can make use of the > >>> `--authoritative` option for even better syntax highlighting. > >>> > >>> Hope that helps! > >>> > >>> David Adam > >>> zanc...@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au > >>> > >>> > >>> [1]: https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/commit/6eb66770a49944 > >>> > >>> On Mon, 3 Nov 2014, Santhosh T wrote: > >>>> the article http://lwn.net/Articles/136232/ says that > >>>> fish shell can show misspelled options as errors. > >>>> > >>>> it has a screenshot also where "--colour" is highlighted in red in "ls > >>>> --colour" command. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> when I tried the same, it didn't work. > >>>> > >>>> so i asked the question.... > >>>> > >>>> - santhosh > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Cedric Auger <sedri...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> 2014-10-31 17:58 GMT+01:00 Santhosh T <santhosh.tek...@gmail.com>: > >>>>> > >>>>>> when i type "ls --unknownoption" > >>>>>> > >>>>>> i am expected "--unknownoption" to be shown in red. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> fish only showing wrong commands in red color, but not wrong options > >>>>>> > >>>>>> i already did run "fish_update_completions" > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I am using MAC > >>>>>> > >>>>>> thanks > >>>>>> Santhosh > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> I first glance, I would say, that it is not a realistic feature. > >>>>> How could you tell if a given option is a right or a wrong one? > >>>>> > >>>>> For the command, work is easy: just ask the file system is there is > >>> such > >>>>> an executable program. > >>>>> But there is no Unix command which tells given a program and options if > >>>>> they are compatible. > >>>>> Of course, like autocompletion, you could forbid some options (but that > >>>>> would concern only very specific programs for which the set of "good" > >>>>> options can be easily known). > >>>>> Plus there should be some clever parsing, as for example "ls -- > >>>>> --unknownoption" is a valid command (at least on the Ubuntu version I > >>> have). > >>>>> That is because I can create a file named "--unknownoption". > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> .../Sedrikov\... > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> > >>> David Adam > >>> zanc...@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au > >>> Ask Me About Our SLA! > >>> > >> > > > > Cheers, > > > > David Adam > > zanc...@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au > > Ask Me About Our SLA! > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > > Fish-users mailing list > > Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users > Cheers, David Adam zanc...@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au Ask Me About Our SLA! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
